Understanding Deferred Consideration vs. Earnouts in Mergers and Acquisitions
In the world of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), structuring the deal can be as crucial as the transaction itself. Two common methods to bridge the gap between buyer and seller expectations are deferred consideration and earnouts. While both serve to mitigate risk and align interests, they operate differently. This blog explores these concepts, helping you understand their implications for buyers and sellers.
What is Deferred Consideration?
Deferred consideration refers to a portion of the purchase price that is paid to the seller at a later date, after the initial transaction closes. This arrangement is often used when the buyer wants to reduce immediate cash outflows or when there is uncertainty about the target's future performance.
Key Features of Deferred Consideration:
Fixed Payment Schedule: The amount and timing of payments are agreed upon in advance.
Less Performance-Dependent: Payments are typically not contingent on future performance metrics.
Risk Mitigation: Protects buyers from overpaying if the acquired business underperforms shortly after acquisition.
Example of Deferred Consideration:
A company purchases a smaller tech firm for £10 million, paying £7 million upfront and deferring the remaining £3 million for two years, based on a pre-agreed payment schedule.
What is an Earnout?
An earnout, on the other hand, is a type of contingent payment tied to the future performance of the acquired business. It incentivizes the seller to ensure the business continues to thrive post-acquisition.
Key Features of Earnouts:
Performance-Based Payments: The seller receives additional payments based on achieving specific financial targets (like revenue or profit milestones) within a designated timeframe.
Alignment of Interests: Encourages sellers to remain engaged in the business post-sale.
Higher Risk for Sellers: If targets are not met, sellers may receive significantly less than expected.
Example of an Earnout:
A buyer acquires a start-up for £5 million upfront, with an additional £2 million contingent on the start-up achieving £1 million in revenue within the next year.
Comparing Deferred Consideration and Earnouts
Aspect Deferred Consideration Earnouts
Payment Structure Fixed and pre-agreed Performance-dependent
Risk Lower risk for buyers Higher risk for sellers
Seller Engagement Limited ongoing involvement Requires active involvement
Use Cases Uncertainty in valuation Uncertain future performance
Pros and Cons of Deferred Consideration:
Deferred Consideration reduces immediate cash burden on buyers and provides certainty for sellers about payment amounts and timing. However, this may lead to disputes over payment timelines and is perceived as less an incentive for sellers to ensure long-term success.
Pros and Cons of Earnouts:
earnouts tend to align with interests of both buyer and seller and can result in a potentially higher total payment for sellers if performance targets are met. However, these deals are complex to structure and manage resulting in the potential for conflicts over performance measurement.
Conclusion
Both deferred consideration and earnouts are valuable tools in M&A transactions, each with its own set of advantages and challenges. Choosing the right structure depends on various factors, including the nature
of the business, market conditions, and the relationship between buyer and seller. Understanding these concepts can lead to more successful negotiations and smoother transitions post-acquisition.
Looking for Acquisition funding? Our partners Business Funding Experts are happy to help.
Tags:
Business, Acquisitions, Deferred Consideration, Earnouts
LEAVE A COMMENT
Latest Posts
Unlocking the True Worth: Effective Ways to Value Your Business
Navigating Your Exit: Crafting the Perfect Exit Strategy
TAGS
